Recruiters needed technology to solve their problems. And now, they have multiple options to choose from. That can sometimes be both a boon and a curse.
With the growing competition in the job market, recruitment is challenging, and there’s no denying that. We might as well sign it and give it to you.
For the same reason, recruiters are looking for ways to identify the most skilled and knowledgeable candidates. An effective method to do the same is by using pre-hiring assessments to evaluate a candidate’s or multiple candidates’ abilities (tech and non-tech) as well as their problem-solving and critical thinking skills.
HackerRank is a popular solution that offers technical assessments and remote interview features, however, recruiters need more than that. And, for this purpose, we have compiled a list of 5 alternate solutions to HackerRank in this blog.
Contents
What is HackerRank?
HackerRank provides solutions such as technical assessments and remote hiring interview solutions for hiring tech talent—developers to be specific.
With their suite of solutions, recruiters can plan their tech hiring by screening, interviewing and ranking developers based on technical skills and competencies for 30+ roles.
Candidates, on the other hand, can practice coding, prepare for interviews, and get hired by companies.
Additionally, they offer this gamut of solutions for the following use cases:
Remote Hiring
University Hiring
Diversity and Inclusion Hiring
Professional Hiring
Professional Services
HackerRank offers solutions specific to tech hiring, there are many alternatives with additional features.
G2 Rating for HackerRank: 4.5/5
Why would you look for HackerRank alternatives?
- A dire need and demand for reasonable coding challenges. Candidates find the current pattern of coding assessments to be above their level of competency
- You may want more flexible billing options
- Your hiring structure demands you create assessments for non-technical hiring
If any of those reasons struck a cord with you, read on, discover more solutions, and find the best HackerRank alternative for your business.
1. HackerRank vs Equip
Equip helps recruiters screen candidates across skills with its automated assessments.
At present, Equip broadly tests these skills:
1. Web Development
2. Programming
3. Sales & Marketing
4. Data Analysis
5. Customer Success
There is a subset of skills that fall under each of the above mentioned skills. For example- Sales and Marketing consists of Digital Marketing, Facebook and Insta Ads, Google Ads, and Business Development.
Teams can utilize Equip’s vast Question Libraries, and create Custom Tests that enable them to hire Developers, Sales, Marketing and Customer Support Executives, Data Analysts and more. That’s a lot, right? All in one platform!
Equip's Advantages over HackerRank
Flexibility in creating Custom Tests. With Equip, you can create a Custom Test once, and use it for multiple assessments, all with a single click.
HackerRank too allows for the creation of Custom tests, however, questions from a Custom Test are individually added to the library. The questions will have to be added later individually which turns out to be a cumbersome task.Equip offers a wide range of question types, such as Coding, MCQs, and it also boasts of voice input and transcription questions, thereby allowing recruiters to assess candidates using varied question types. It has more than 10 questions types to choose from.
Here’s how Equip prevents candidates from cheating: Equip has a Randomized Template Feature that prevents candidates from making the questions publicly available. What’s more? When you upload a question template, it will show different variants of the same question to different users, thereby preventing any scope for cheating.
On Proctoring tests and assessing candidates fairly: All of Equip’s assessments are AI-proctored using Auto Proctor (built by the same team that built Equip).
In addition to the proctoring features on HackerRank, these are the bonus features Equip offers:
Detecting switched tab and its screenshot
Capturing Random Photos
Capturing Multiple Monitors
Enforce Full-Screen
Record User-Session
Detecting Multiple Faces
Recording Audio
Disabling Copy/Paste
Webcam Preview for the Candidate
G2 Rating for Equip: 4.8/5
Pricing and Free Trial for Equip
Equip has a 14-day free trial wherein you can assess 25 candidates for free and access all features available on the Standard Plan. No credit card is required. You can compare the different pricing plans and choose the one that fits you best.
2. HackerRank vs HackerEarth
HackerEarth is an online assessment technical-recruitment tool that enables you to create tests and evaluate candidates to find the right fit for your team.
HackerEarth's Advantages over HackerRank
HackerEarth assessments are found to be suitable for entry-level and senior roles whereas HackerRank assessments are more beginner-friendly for entry-level hiring.
HackerEarth has a learning and development platform for employees that provides insights into your teams' skill gaps and helps them upskill at par with industry-leading tech teams.
G2 Rating for HackerEarth: 4.4/5
Pricing and Free Trial for HackerEarth
HackerEarth’s pricing is divided between Products and Bundles.
For more information about the bundle category and a detailed overview of their pricing plan, you can visit HackerEarth Pricing.
HackerEarth offers a 14-day free trial without any strings attached (aka Credit Card).
3. HackerRank vs iMocha
iMocha offers talent development teams a unified skills intelligence platform that allows them to make data-driven, skills-based, bias-free decisions from hiring to retirement.
They offer a bunch of solutions across categories such as Talent Acquisition, Talent Development, AI-English Pro, Skill Library, and an eLearning solution.
iMocha's Advantages over HackerRank
You can conduct assessments for non-technical skills
Offers Analysis of Question Difficulty Levels
AI-enabled One-Way Video Interview
AI-LogicBox - Innovative & Patented Question Type
Recruiter Performance Report
Video Proctoring with analysis
G2 Rating for iMocha: 4.4/5
Pricing and Free Trial for iMocha
Their pricing structure is comprehensive across three categories:
Talent Acquisition
Talent Development
Campus/University Hiring
The pricing is then further divided between ‘professional’, and ‘enterprise’ plans for each of the categories.
iMocha offers a free plan, however, it requires companies to get in touch with them and it not self-served from their website.
4. HackerRank vs Mettl
An online platform, Mettl offers solutions for use cases such as Online examinations, and Hiring & Learning and Development.
Mettl's Advantages over HackerRank
For analytics, Mettl has in-depth skill, candidate and group-level analytics with benchmarks.
It provides advanced proctoring and session recordings, whereas HackerRank only provides proctoring of recorded sessions.
Mettl provides assessments for Personality, Behavior, Cognitive & Domain Assessments.
G2 Rating for Mettl: 4.4/5
Pricing and Free Trial for Mettl
Pricing information is not listed on the website. Get in touch with their sales team for pricing and a free trial.
5. HackerRank vs CodeSignal
CodeSignal is a leading technical interview and assessment solution. It offers advanced job simulation technology across the whole hiring process.
CodeSignal's Advantages over HackerRank
According to G2, CodeSignal offers higher user satisfaction than HackerRank. Codesignal’s advantages over HackerRank:
- CodeSignal has Predictive Coding Score
- Offers Advanced IDE
- Offers Dynamic live preview for frontend & mobile tasks in IDE
- What’s more? It also offers Integrated terminal, Coding playback, and Project-based tasks (e.g. Mobile React-native)
- Offers complete support for building full-stack applications
- Templates & test review for structured interviews
G2 Rating for CodeSignal: 4.5/5
Pricing and Free Trial for CodeSignal
Their pricing strategy is similar to that of Mettl, wherein it offers personalized plans based on the organization’s needs.
Conclusion
Choosing the right pre-hiring platform is crucial for companies looking to hire skilled professionals. With the rise of remote work and the need for technical skills, pre-hiring assessments are an essential tool for recruiters to evaluate a candidate's abilities.
With the funding winter and recession on the rise, recruiters now need to focus more on saving both time and money. And startups are always in the crunch for both.
It’s important to address the elephant in the room (read: this blog).
All assessment tools listed above have tremendous capabilities and ability to fulfil requirements for various companies, but not all of them are efficient. Why?
Most of them only offer technical assessments, are limited in their proctoring capabilities, and some have limitation with customised tests.
We can almost hear them say “we aren’t for everybody”, and that’s okay.
But, as recruiters, you need to optimize for time. This is where you would need to prioritize selecting a screening tool that offers you more than just tech assessments. This way, you will not run to another tool when your company needs to hire for non-tech roles.
This is one of the reasons why Equip was built. To help recruiters, founders, and leaders save the most time and conduct their hiring through one unified platform.
If that sounds like something that might fulfil your hiring goals, watch how you can create an Equip assessment in 90 seconds.
You might also like: 10 Lever Integrations for Better Talent Acquisition: Sourcing to Onboarding
