Efficiently identifying top candidates for non-technical roles is just as crucial as for technical ones. From sales and customer support to HR and operations, the right assessment platform can significantly streamline your hiring process. We've explored several leading options, and here's why Equip emerges as the undisputed #1 choice for non-tech hiring.
While many platforms offer diverse assessment types, Equip differentiates itself through unbeatable value, comprehensive non-technical skill coverage, and advanced anti-cheating measures, making it a superior alternative to Adaface, Evalgator, Toggl Hire, Testlify, and Xobin.
1. Equip: Your #1 Choice for Non-Technical Talent Assessment
Equip's standout features make it uniquely suited for the demands of modern non-tech recruitment:
- Transparent and Economical Pricing: Pay-As-You-Go, No Subscriptions. Equip offers a straightforward pay-as-you-go model, starting at just $1 per candidate. This means no minimums, no recurring subscriptions, and no lock-in contracts. Credits purchased with Equip never expire. This flexible approach makes it an incredibly economical choice for businesses of all sizes, allowing you to pay only for what you use. This directly contrasts with platforms like Adaface, which start at $180/year, or Testlify, which begins at $100 per month for just 10 candidate credits. Xobin is also estimated to cost 97% more for assessing 100 candidates compared to Equip.
- Comprehensive Non-Technical Skill Assessment and Customisation Equip provides a wide array of test types specifically for non-technical roles, including Sales, Customer Support, Content Writing, and Business Development. You can conduct:
- General Aptitude, Logical & Analytical Reasoning tests with pre-existing Question Banks across difficulty levels.
- English Skills tests for language, communication, grammar & vocabulary, with automated results based on the CEFR framework.
- Psychometric Tests to assess soft skills, personality, and behavioural traits, including DISC and OCEAN (Big-Five) personality tests.
- Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) to evaluate critical soft skills like communication, teamwork, and adaptability.
- Video Response questions to assess communication skills for customer-facing roles, with no video storage or downloads required.
- Typing Tests for speed and accuracy.
- Excel Tests with spreadsheet simulation.
- Attention to Detail tests. Equip allows recruiters to create fully customised assessments tailored to specific roles by combining various question types from its extensive question bank or by adding their own questions. You can also bulk upload your own questions using an Excel file.
- Smarter AI-Powered Proctoring for Integrity Equip integrates advanced AI-powered AutoProctor features to ensure test integrity and prevent cheating. These include:
- Tab-switch detection and screenshot capture.
- Real-time face detection and tracking, including multiple faces.
- Audio monitoring.
- Session recording, allowing you to replay how candidates interacted with their screens.
- Disabling copy-paste.
- Detecting multiple monitors.
- Enforcing full-screen mode.
- Automatic Trust Score calculation. This comprehensive suite provides a much higher level of security than some competitors, for instance, Adaface, which lacks the same level of advanced proctoring, or Testlify, which may require additional payment for smarter proctoring features.
How Equip Compares to Other Platforms for Non-Tech Hiring:
Let's examine how other notable platforms stack up, particularly in the context of non-tech hiring:
- Adaface
- Focus: Adaface primarily focuses on conversational assessments.
- Non-Tech Scope: It does offer a library of pre-made tests for various technical and non-technical roles and allows for tailored assessments.
- Pricing: Its pricing starts at $180/year and is typically tailored for larger budgets, which can be less accessible for smaller teams compared to Equip's pay-as-you-go model.
- Proctoring: While it includes IP tracking, webcam proctoring, and plagiarism detection, it lacks the same depth of advanced proctoring capabilities as Equip, particularly features like comprehensive environmental checks and audio monitoring.
- Evalgator
- Non-Tech Scope: Evalgator offers a range of test formats suitable for comprehensive candidate assessments across various roles, including aptitude tests, psychometric evaluations, and video responses. It also allows for full customisation of assessments.
- Pricing: Evalgator costs ₹180 per candidate, which is significantly higher than Equip's ₹85 per candidate (Note: The source provides INR pricing, so comparison is based on this relative cost).
- Real-time Coding: Evalgator provides real-time coding environments, though this feature is more relevant for technical roles.
- Proctoring: While Equip incorporates robust anti-cheating measures with AutoProctor for integrity, detailed specific proctoring features for Evalgator beyond this are not explicitly provided in the comparison.
- Toggl Hire
- Non-Tech Scope: Toggl Hire offers a range of assessments, including personality and cognitive tests, making it suitable for non-tech roles. It is designed for remote hiring and includes gamified assessments to keep candidates engaged.
- Pricing: Toggl Hire uses subscription-based plans, which, while predictable, might lead to higher costs for organisations with lower or variable hiring volumes compared to Equip's per-candidate flexibility.
- Automated Shortlisting: A key feature is its automated shortlisting, where recruiters can set pass thresholds to streamline the process.
- Proctoring/Customisation: Detailed information on its proctoring capabilities and in-depth customisation options were not extensively covered in the provided source for a direct comparison with Equip's advanced features.
- Testlify
- Non-Tech Scope: Testlify provides a diverse range of tests, including cognitive ability, psychometric, and personality assessments, as well as role-specific tests for industries like finance and retail. It also allows for test customisation based on role requirements.
- Pricing: Testlify's plans start at $100 per month for 10 candidate credits, which is notably more expensive than Equip's $1 per candidate model.
- Proctoring: Equip's smarter AI-proctoring features are built-in at no extra cost, unlike Testlify, where additional payment may be required for more advanced security features.
- ATS Integration: Testlify integrates with popular ATS platforms like Greenhouse, Lever, and BambooHR.
- Xobin
- Non-Tech Scope: Xobin offers pre-employment assessments covering behavioral and cognitive skills across multiple roles, including sales and HR, evaluating both technical and soft skills. However, Equip provides a wider range of unique non-tech test types, such as Typing Tests, Excel Tests, DISC, OCEAN Personality Tests, and Language Proficiency Tests, which Xobin does not explicitly list.
- Ease of Use/Onboarding: Xobin requires a sales demo to get started, potentially leading to a more tedious setup, whereas Equip offers a self-serve product where you can begin exploring with free credits on day one.
- Pricing: Xobin is estimated to cost 97% more for assessing 100 candidates compared to Equip's transparent $1 per candidate pricing.
- Proctoring: Equip's AI-powered proctoring is considered superior, with Xobin's options feeling limited in comparison.
- ATS Integration: Xobin integrates seamlessly with ATS platforms like Greenhouse, Lever, and Workable.
The Verdict
For organisations prioritising cost-effectiveness, extensive and flexible non-technical assessment capabilities, and robust anti-cheating measures, Equip stands out as the optimal choice. Its pay-as-you-go model offers unparalleled financial flexibility, while its diverse range of non-tech tests and superior AI-proctoring ensure you can thoroughly and securely evaluate candidates for any role. Equip's focus on user satisfaction (rated #1 globally on G2) further solidifies its position as the top platform for streamlining your non-tech hiring.