Equip lets you create teams and start exploring with free credits, while Xobin requires a sales demo to get started. You can get started on Equip on day 1—it work off the shelf without worrying about a tedious setup and onboarding process.
Start Free TrialEquip’s pricing is straightforward—$1 per candidate with no hidden charges. Xobin, by contrast, is estimated to cost 97% more for assessing 100 candidates.
Compare PricingEquip ensures top-tier integrity with AI-powered proctoring, while Xobin's proctoring options feel limited in comparison.
Explore featuresFeature
Whether you need assessments for hiring at a startup or an enterprise, Equip has all the features and pricing plans to help you screen the most eligible candidates for every role.
Equip is rated #1 for User-Satisfaction. Need we say more?
Start free trialEquip offers a wider range of test types compared to Xobin such as Typing Tests, Excel Tests, DISC, OCEAN Personality Tests and Language Proficiency Tests.
Start free trialFor feature updates and roadmap, our users preferred the direction of Equip over Xobin.
Start free trialTest 10,000+ candidates simultaneously
Skill-specific assessments in seconds
Manage candidate pipeline. Shortlist, reject, etc.
Aptitude, Coding, Psychometric, Communication
No credit card, No commitments
Yes. Equip is fully self-serve with free credits, so you can create a team and run your first assessment on day 1. Xobin typically requires a sales demo before you can begin.
Equip is a simple $1 per candidate—no contracts, no hidden fees. Xobin is a pure-subscription model (starts $699/year) with a fixed candidate allowance. If you assess 100 candidates this year, Equip is $100; with a subscription you’re paying thousands whether you use the full allotment or not.
Not very. Recreate your core tests in Equip (or use our templates), import candidates, and move forward without waiting for contract cycles. You’ll likely save money immediately.
Yep. Share assessment links at scale, automate results, and pay only for the candidates who actually test.
Faster time-to-value, transparent usage-based pricing, stronger integrity signals, and broader test coverage—without the “talk to sales first” roadblock.